The Good, the Bad, and ‘the Daily Show’ Reading Analysis

Analysis of The Good, The Bad, and The Daily charge In Jason Zinsers The Good, the Bad, andThe Daily sight his purpose was to formulate a response to the uncertainty regarding the authenticity and ethics of put on intelligence agency sources. Zinser begins by discussing if it is acceptable to obtain information from a pleasing and lots satirical news source (in this example,The Daily Show), he points out that the question isnt whether Jon Stewart or the evidences producers and writers are morally corrupt wad, but whether or not fake news is, on the whole, beneficial or damaging to society (Zinser 363-364).In another(prenominal) words, he begs the question, can we really be an cognizant public that can contribute, comprehend, and function as a democracy through the projections of a fake news source? Zinser then makes the claim that fake news causes two vices, the first being deception collect to the lack of valuing objectivity in their reports. The second is dilution, both in the quality of media from the variance of online sources as sound as adding excessive news reports attracting more viewers to what is typically a hard news source.Zinser besides reminds us of the beneficial aspects in fake news. Empirical data suggests a trend that either viewers of The Daily Showare better informed than those watching hard news because of its effectiveness, or, on the other hand that it attracts viewers who already know about the current events being discussed, evidence of its success.The ideal solution, he concludes, would be to merge the two, retaining the power and persuasion ofThe Daily Showas well as including discretion and insight more apparent in hard news reports, helping viewers understand distinguishable sides of the arguments present (Zinser 371). When diving into Zinsers writing, some similar aspects from George Orwells, Politics in the English Language came to mind. Orwell states, unreasonable thoughts, being a result of language, language has become a result of foolish thoughts.Vagueness is the most unpatterned characteristic of the English prose. There is a lack of imagery and the figurative language no all-night gives a connection to images and concrete thoughts. When comparing this to the satirical writing and language that Zinser speaks of in The Good, The Bad, and The Daily Show it creates a perfect picture of how by exemplifying the two vices, (deception and dilution) misconceptions can easily happen, especially when your that news source is a satirical fake ews source. When thinking about some of the other fake news sources, one example that might be overlooked is The Onion a very customary source from which the stories are based on fact but written in a humorous and satirical way. Being that The Onion makes fun of all different types of news events from health issues to sports, The Onion real delves into multiple aspects of our culture in a comical way but still delivering facts and informing people about what is going on in the man.In this case it can be just as influential as real news. In fact an example of The Onions influential satirical news was captured when they produce the worlds sexiest man and posted Kim Jong Un (the North Korean Dictator) as the sexiest man alive. North Korea took it serious and published it in their local paper and made a big deal out of it (news. yahoo. com). It is in this identical sense that is described in Zinsers analysis of this so called fake news that you can retrieve an idea of the actual influence this has on our culture.